| Signal | DeepSeek V3.1 | Delta | Qwen3.5 397B A17B |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 57 | -14 | |
Context window size | 72 | -14 | |
Output Capacity | 64 | -16 | |
Pricing Tier | 1 | -3 | |
Recency | 97 | -3 | |
Versatility | 33 | -33 | |
| Overall Result | 0 wins | of 6 | 6 wins |
0
days ranked higher
0
days
30
days ranked higher
DeepSeek
Alibaba
DeepSeek V3.1 saves you $177.50/month
That's $2130.00/year compared to Qwen3.5 397B A17B at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.
| Metric | DeepSeek V3.1 | Qwen3.5 397B A17B | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 50 | 61 | Qwen3.5 397B A17B |
| Rank | #120 | #46 | Qwen3.5 397B A17B |
| Quality Rank | #120 | #46 | Qwen3.5 397B A17B |
| Adoption Rank | #120 | #46 | Qwen3.5 397B A17B |
| Parameters | -- | -- | -- |
| Context Window | 33K | 262K | Qwen3.5 397B A17B |
| Pricing | $0.15/$0.75/M | $0.55/$3.50/M | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 57 | 71 | Qwen3.5 397B A17B |
| Context window size | 72 | 86 | Qwen3.5 397B A17B |
| Output Capacity | 64 | 80 | Qwen3.5 397B A17B |
| Pricing Tier | 1 | 4 | Qwen3.5 397B A17B |
| Recency | 97 | 100 | Qwen3.5 397B A17B |
| Versatility | 33 | 67 | Qwen3.5 397B A17B |
Qwen3.5 397B A17B clearly outperforms DeepSeek V3.1 with a significant 11.699999999999996-point lead. For most general use cases, Qwen3.5 397B A17B is the stronger choice. However, DeepSeek V3.1 may still excel in niche scenarios.
Best for Quality
DeepSeek V3.1
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Cost
DeepSeek V3.1
78% lower pricing; better value at scale
Best for Reliability
DeepSeek V3.1
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
DeepSeek V3.1
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
DeepSeek V3.1
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by DeepSeek
Qwen3.5 397B A17B currently scores higher (61 vs 50), but the best choice depends on your specific use case, budget, and requirements.
DeepSeek V3.1 is ranked #120 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B is ranked #46. Rankings are based on a composite score from multiple signals including benchmarks, community sentiment, and adoption metrics.
Compare the detailed pricing breakdown above to see which model offers better value for your usage pattern.