| Signal | ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking | Delta | GPT-5.2 |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 29 | -57 | |
Context window size | 81 | -8 | |
Output Capacity | 80 | -5 | |
Pricing Tier | 0 | -14 | |
Recency | 100 | -- | |
Versatility | 33 | -33 | |
| Overall Result | 0 wins | of 6 | 5 wins |
0
days ranked higher
0
days
30
days ranked higher
Baidu
OpenAI
ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking saves you $854.00/month
That's $10248.00/year compared to GPT-5.2 at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.
| Metric | ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking | GPT-5.2 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 46 | 68 | GPT-5.2 |
| Rank | #174 | #13 | GPT-5.2 |
| Quality Rank | #174 | #13 | GPT-5.2 |
| Adoption Rank | #174 | #13 | GPT-5.2 |
| Parameters | -- | -- | -- |
| Context Window | 131K | 400K | GPT-5.2 |
| Pricing | $0.07/$0.28/M | $1.75/$14.00/M | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 29 | 86 | GPT-5.2 |
| Context window size | 81 | 89 | GPT-5.2 |
| Output Capacity | 80 | 85 | GPT-5.2 |
| Pricing Tier | 0 | 14 | GPT-5.2 |
| Recency | 100 | 100 | ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking |
| Versatility | 33 | 67 | GPT-5.2 |
GPT-5.2 clearly outperforms ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking with a significant 22.60000000000001-point lead. For most general use cases, GPT-5.2 is the stronger choice. However, ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking may still excel in niche scenarios.
Best for Quality
ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Cost
ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking
98% lower pricing; better value at scale
Best for Reliability
ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by Baidu
GPT-5.2 currently scores higher (68 vs 46), but the best choice depends on your specific use case, budget, and requirements.
ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking is ranked #174 and GPT-5.2 is ranked #13. Rankings are based on a composite score from multiple signals including benchmarks, community sentiment, and adoption metrics.
Compare the detailed pricing breakdown above to see which model offers better value for your usage pattern.