| Signal | ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B | Delta | MiniMax M2.5 |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 57 | -- | |
Context window size | 71 | -13 | |
Output Capacity | 65 | -23 | |
Pricing Tier | 1 | -1 | |
Recency | 96 | -4 | |
Versatility | 50 | +17 | |
| Overall Result | 1 wins | of 6 | 4 wins |
1
days ranked higher
3
days
26
days ranked higher
Baidu
MiniMax
ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B saves you $47.50/month
That's $570.00/year compared to MiniMax M2.5 at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.
| Metric | ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B | MiniMax M2.5 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 51 | 54 | MiniMax M2.5 |
| Rank | #105 | #79 | MiniMax M2.5 |
| Quality Rank | #105 | #79 | MiniMax M2.5 |
| Adoption Rank | #105 | #79 | MiniMax M2.5 |
| Parameters | -- | -- | -- |
| Context Window | 30K | 197K | MiniMax M2.5 |
| Pricing | $0.14/$0.56/M | $0.29/$1.20/M | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 57 | 57 | ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B |
| Context window size | 71 | 84 | MiniMax M2.5 |
| Output Capacity | 65 | 88 | MiniMax M2.5 |
| Pricing Tier | 1 | 1 | MiniMax M2.5 |
| Recency | 96 | 100 | MiniMax M2.5 |
| Versatility | 50 | 33 | ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B |
MiniMax M2.5 has a moderate advantage with a 3.299999999999997-point lead in composite score. It wins on more signal dimensions, but ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B has specific strengths that could make it the better choice for certain workflows.
Best for Quality
ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Cost
ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B
53% lower pricing; better value at scale
Best for Reliability
ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by Baidu
MiniMax M2.5 currently scores higher (54 vs 51), but the best choice depends on your specific use case, budget, and requirements.
ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B is ranked #105 and MiniMax M2.5 is ranked #79. Rankings are based on a composite score from multiple signals including benchmarks, community sentiment, and adoption metrics.
Compare the detailed pricing breakdown above to see which model offers better value for your usage pattern.