| Signal | ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B | Delta | o3 |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 57 | -29 | |
Context window size | 71 | -13 | |
Output Capacity | 65 | -18 | |
Pricing Tier | 1 | -7 | |
Recency | 96 | +22 | |
Versatility | 50 | -17 | |
| Overall Result | 1 wins | of 6 | 5 wins |
0
days ranked higher
0
days
30
days ranked higher
Baidu
OpenAI
ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B saves you $558.00/month
That's $6696.00/year compared to o3 at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.
| Metric | ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B | o3 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 51 | 62 | o3 |
| Rank | #105 | #44 | o3 |
| Quality Rank | #105 | #44 | o3 |
| Adoption Rank | #105 | #44 | o3 |
| Parameters | -- | -- | -- |
| Context Window | 30K | 200K | o3 |
| Pricing | $0.14/$0.56/M | $2.00/$8.00/M | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 57 | 86 | o3 |
| Context window size | 71 | 84 | o3 |
| Output Capacity | 65 | 83 | o3 |
| Pricing Tier | 1 | 8 | o3 |
| Recency | 96 | 74 | ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B |
| Versatility | 50 | 67 | o3 |
o3 clearly outperforms ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B with a significant 11.200000000000003-point lead. For most general use cases, o3 is the stronger choice. However, ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B may still excel in niche scenarios.
Best for Quality
ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Cost
ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B
93% lower pricing; better value at scale
Best for Reliability
ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by Baidu
o3 currently scores higher (62 vs 51), but the best choice depends on your specific use case, budget, and requirements.
ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B is ranked #105 and o3 is ranked #44. Rankings are based on a composite score from multiple signals including benchmarks, community sentiment, and adoption metrics.
Compare the detailed pricing breakdown above to see which model offers better value for your usage pattern.