| Signal | ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B | Delta | GPT-5.2 |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 43 | -43 | |
Context window size | 81 | -8 | |
Output Capacity | 70 | -15 | |
Pricing Tier | 1 | -13 | |
Recency | 88 | -12 | |
Versatility | 50 | -17 | |
| Overall Result | 0 wins | of 6 | 6 wins |
0
days ranked higher
0
days
30
days ranked higher
Baidu
OpenAI
ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B saves you $770.50/month
That's $9246.00/year compared to GPT-5.2 at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.
| Metric | ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B | GPT-5.2 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 48 | 68 | GPT-5.2 |
| Rank | #137 | #13 | GPT-5.2 |
| Quality Rank | #137 | #13 | GPT-5.2 |
| Adoption Rank | #137 | #13 | GPT-5.2 |
| Parameters | -- | -- | -- |
| Context Window | 123K | 400K | GPT-5.2 |
| Pricing | $0.42/$1.25/M | $1.75/$14.00/M | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 43 | 86 | GPT-5.2 |
| Context window size | 81 | 89 | GPT-5.2 |
| Output Capacity | 70 | 85 | GPT-5.2 |
| Pricing Tier | 1 | 14 | GPT-5.2 |
| Recency | 88 | 100 | GPT-5.2 |
| Versatility | 50 | 67 | GPT-5.2 |
GPT-5.2 clearly outperforms ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B with a significant 20.10000000000001-point lead. For most general use cases, GPT-5.2 is the stronger choice. However, ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B may still excel in niche scenarios.
Best for Quality
ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Cost
ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B
89% lower pricing; better value at scale
Best for Reliability
ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by Baidu
GPT-5.2 currently scores higher (68 vs 48), but the best choice depends on your specific use case, budget, and requirements.
ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B is ranked #137 and GPT-5.2 is ranked #13. Rankings are based on a composite score from multiple signals including benchmarks, community sentiment, and adoption metrics.
Compare the detailed pricing breakdown above to see which model offers better value for your usage pattern.