| Signal | Gemma 3n 4B (free) | Delta | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 29 | +29 | |
Context window size | 62 | +62 | |
Output Capacity | 55 | +55 | |
Pricing Tier | 30 | +30 | |
Recency | 81 | +81 | |
Versatility | 33 | +33 | |
| Overall Result | 6 wins | of 6 | 0 wins |
0
days ranked higher
0
days
30
days ranked higher
xAI
Pricing unavailable
| Metric | Gemma 3n 4B (free) | Grok 4.1 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 45 | 92 | Grok 4.1 |
| Rank | #184 | #6 | Grok 4.1 |
| Quality Rank | #184 | #6 | Grok 4.1 |
| Adoption Rank | #184 | #7 | Grok 4.1 |
| Parameters | -- | -- | -- |
| Context Window | 8K | 2000K | Grok 4.1 |
| Pricing | Free | -- | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 29 | -- | Gemma 3n 4B (free) |
| Context window size | 62 | -- | Gemma 3n 4B (free) |
| Output Capacity | 55 | -- | Gemma 3n 4B (free) |
| Pricing Tier | 30 | -- | Gemma 3n 4B (free) |
| Recency | 81 | -- | Gemma 3n 4B (free) |
| Versatility | 33 | -- | Gemma 3n 4B (free) |
Grok 4.1 clearly outperforms Gemma 3n 4B (free) with a significant 47.1-point lead. For most general use cases, Grok 4.1 is the stronger choice. However, Gemma 3n 4B (free) may still excel in niche scenarios.
Best for Quality
Gemma 3n 4B (free)
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Reliability
Gemma 3n 4B (free)
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
Gemma 3n 4B (free)
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
Gemma 3n 4B (free)
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by Google
Grok 4.1 currently scores higher (92 vs 45), but the best choice depends on your specific use case, budget, and requirements.
Gemma 3n 4B (free) is ranked #184 and Grok 4.1 is ranked #6. Rankings are based on a composite score from multiple signals including benchmarks, community sentiment, and adoption metrics.
Pricing information may not be available for both models. Check individual model pages for the latest pricing details.