| Signal | GPT-4.1 Nano | Delta | o3 |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 71 | -14 | |
Context window size | 96 | +11 | |
Output Capacity | 75 | -8 | |
Pricing Tier | 0 | -8 | |
Recency | 74 | 0 | |
Versatility | 67 | -- | |
| Overall Result | 1 wins | of 6 | 4 wins |
1
days ranked higher
3
days
26
days ranked higher
OpenAI
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 Nano saves you $570.00/month
That's $6840.00/year compared to o3 at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.
| Metric | GPT-4.1 Nano | o3 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 58 | 62 | o3 |
| Rank | #67 | #44 | o3 |
| Quality Rank | #67 | #44 | o3 |
| Adoption Rank | #67 | #44 | o3 |
| Parameters | -- | -- | -- |
| Context Window | 1048K | 200K | GPT-4.1 Nano |
| Pricing | $0.10/$0.40/M | $2.00/$8.00/M | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 71 | 86 | o3 |
| Context window size | 96 | 84 | GPT-4.1 Nano |
| Output Capacity | 75 | 83 | o3 |
| Pricing Tier | 0 | 8 | o3 |
| Recency | 74 | 74 | o3 |
| Versatility | 67 | 67 | GPT-4.1 Nano |
o3 has a moderate advantage with a 4.600000000000001-point lead in composite score. It wins on more signal dimensions, but GPT-4.1 Nano has specific strengths that could make it the better choice for certain workflows.
Best for Quality
GPT-4.1 Nano
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Cost
GPT-4.1 Nano
95% lower pricing; better value at scale
Best for Reliability
GPT-4.1 Nano
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
GPT-4.1 Nano
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
GPT-4.1 Nano
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by OpenAI
o3 currently scores higher (62 vs 58), but the best choice depends on your specific use case, budget, and requirements.
GPT-4.1 Nano is ranked #67 and o3 is ranked #44. Rankings are based on a composite score from multiple signals including benchmarks, community sentiment, and adoption metrics.
Compare the detailed pricing breakdown above to see which model offers better value for your usage pattern.