| Signal | GPT-4.1 | Delta | o3 |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 71 | -14 | |
Context window size | 96 | +11 | |
Output Capacity | 75 | -8 | |
Pricing Tier | 8 | -- | |
Recency | 74 | 0 | |
Versatility | 67 | -- | |
| Overall Result | 1 wins | of 6 | 3 wins |
4
days ranked higher
1
days
25
days ranked higher
OpenAI
OpenAI
| Metric | GPT-4.1 | o3 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 60 | 62 | o3 |
| Rank | #59 | #44 | o3 |
| Quality Rank | #59 | #44 | o3 |
| Adoption Rank | #59 | #44 | o3 |
| Parameters | -- | -- | -- |
| Context Window | 1048K | 200K | GPT-4.1 |
| Pricing | $2.00/$8.00/M | $2.00/$8.00/M | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 71 | 86 | o3 |
| Context window size | 96 | 84 | GPT-4.1 |
| Output Capacity | 75 | 83 | o3 |
| Pricing Tier | 8 | 8 | GPT-4.1 |
| Recency | 74 | 74 | o3 |
| Versatility | 67 | 67 | GPT-4.1 |
GPT-4.1 and o3 are extremely close in overall performance (only 2.700000000000003 points apart). Your best choice depends entirely on which specific strengths matter most for your use case.
Best for Quality
GPT-4.1
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Cost
GPT-4.1
0% lower pricing; better value at scale
Best for Reliability
GPT-4.1
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
GPT-4.1
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
GPT-4.1
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by OpenAI
o3 currently scores higher (62 vs 60), but the best choice depends on your specific use case, budget, and requirements.
GPT-4.1 is ranked #59 and o3 is ranked #44. Rankings are based on a composite score from multiple signals including benchmarks, community sentiment, and adoption metrics.
Compare the detailed pricing breakdown above to see which model offers better value for your usage pattern.