| Signal | GPT-4 (older v0314) | Delta | o3 |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 43 | -43 | |
Context window size | 62 | -22 | |
Output Capacity | 60 | -23 | |
Pricing Tier | 60 | +52 | |
Recency | 0 | -74 | |
Versatility | 33 | -33 | |
| Overall Result | 1 wins | of 6 | 5 wins |
0
days ranked higher
0
days
30
days ranked higher
OpenAI
OpenAI
o3 saves you $5400.00/month
That's $64800.00/year compared to GPT-4 (older v0314) at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.
| Metric | GPT-4 (older v0314) | o3 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 44 | 62 | o3 |
| Rank | #189 | #44 | o3 |
| Quality Rank | #189 | #44 | o3 |
| Adoption Rank | #189 | #44 | o3 |
| Parameters | -- | -- | -- |
| Context Window | 8K | 200K | o3 |
| Pricing | $30.00/$60.00/M | $2.00/$8.00/M | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 43 | 86 | o3 |
| Context window size | 62 | 84 | o3 |
| Output Capacity | 60 | 83 | o3 |
| Pricing Tier | 60 | 8 | GPT-4 (older v0314) |
| Recency | 0 | 74 | o3 |
| Versatility | 33 | 67 | o3 |
o3 clearly outperforms GPT-4 (older v0314) with a significant 17.800000000000004-point lead. For most general use cases, o3 is the stronger choice. However, GPT-4 (older v0314) may still excel in niche scenarios.
Best for Quality
GPT-4 (older v0314)
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Cost
o3
89% lower pricing; better value at scale
Best for Reliability
GPT-4 (older v0314)
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
GPT-4 (older v0314)
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
GPT-4 (older v0314)
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by OpenAI
o3 currently scores higher (62 vs 44), but the best choice depends on your specific use case, budget, and requirements.
GPT-4 (older v0314) is ranked #189 and o3 is ranked #44. Rankings are based on a composite score from multiple signals including benchmarks, community sentiment, and adoption metrics.
Compare the detailed pricing breakdown above to see which model offers better value for your usage pattern.