| Signal | GPT-4 Turbo | Delta | GPT-5.2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Result | 0 wins | of 0 | 0 wins |
0
days ranked higher
0
days
30
days ranked higher
OpenAI
OpenAI
Pricing unavailable
| Metric | GPT-4 Turbo | GPT-5.2 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 85 | 95 | GPT-5.2 |
| Rank | #6 | #3 | GPT-5.2 |
| Quality Rank | #6 | #3 | GPT-5.2 |
| Adoption Rank | #5 | #1 | GPT-5.2 |
| Parameters | -- | -- | -- |
| Context Window | 128K | 256K | GPT-5.2 |
| Pricing | $10.00/$30.00/M | -- | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
GPT-5.2 clearly outperforms GPT-4 Turbo with a significant 10.120000000000005-point lead. For most general use cases, GPT-5.2 is the stronger choice. However, GPT-4 Turbo may still excel in niche scenarios.
Best for Quality
GPT-4 Turbo
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Reliability
GPT-4 Turbo
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
GPT-4 Turbo
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
GPT-4 Turbo
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by OpenAI
GPT-5.2 currently scores higher (95 vs 85), but the best choice depends on your specific use case, budget, and requirements.
GPT-4 Turbo is ranked #6 and GPT-5.2 is ranked #3. Rankings are based on a composite score from multiple signals including benchmarks, community sentiment, and adoption metrics.
Pricing information may not be available for both models. Check individual model pages for the latest pricing details.