| Signal | GPT-4o (2024-11-20) | Delta | o3 |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 57 | -29 | |
Context window size | 81 | -3 | |
Output Capacity | 70 | -13 | |
Pricing Tier | 10 | +2 | |
Recency | 48 | -27 | |
Versatility | 67 | -- | |
| Overall Result | 1 wins | of 6 | 4 wins |
0
days ranked higher
0
days
30
days ranked higher
OpenAI
OpenAI
o3 saves you $150.00/month
That's $1800.00/year compared to GPT-4o (2024-11-20) at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.
| Metric | GPT-4o (2024-11-20) | o3 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 50 | 62 | o3 |
| Rank | #117 | #44 | o3 |
| Quality Rank | #117 | #44 | o3 |
| Adoption Rank | #117 | #44 | o3 |
| Parameters | -- | -- | -- |
| Context Window | 128K | 200K | o3 |
| Pricing | $2.50/$10.00/M | $2.00/$8.00/M | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 57 | 86 | o3 |
| Context window size | 81 | 84 | o3 |
| Output Capacity | 70 | 83 | o3 |
| Pricing Tier | 10 | 8 | GPT-4o (2024-11-20) |
| Recency | 48 | 74 | o3 |
| Versatility | 67 | 67 | GPT-4o (2024-11-20) |
o3 clearly outperforms GPT-4o (2024-11-20) with a significant 12.400000000000006-point lead. For most general use cases, o3 is the stronger choice. However, GPT-4o (2024-11-20) may still excel in niche scenarios.
Best for Quality
GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Cost
o3
20% lower pricing; better value at scale
Best for Reliability
GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by OpenAI
o3 currently scores higher (62 vs 50), but the best choice depends on your specific use case, budget, and requirements.
GPT-4o (2024-11-20) is ranked #117 and o3 is ranked #44. Rankings are based on a composite score from multiple signals including benchmarks, community sentiment, and adoption metrics.
Compare the detailed pricing breakdown above to see which model offers better value for your usage pattern.