| Signal | GPT-5.1-Codex | Delta | GPT-5.2 |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 71 | -14 | |
Context window size | 89 | -- | |
Output Capacity | 85 | -- | |
Pricing Tier | 10 | -4 | |
Recency | 100 | -- | |
Versatility | 50 | -17 | |
| Overall Result | 0 wins | of 6 | 3 wins |
0
days ranked higher
1
days
29
days ranked higher
OpenAI
OpenAI
GPT-5.1-Codex saves you $250.00/month
That's $3000.00/year compared to GPT-5.2 at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.
| Metric | GPT-5.1-Codex | GPT-5.2 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 62 | 68 | GPT-5.2 |
| Rank | #42 | #13 | GPT-5.2 |
| Quality Rank | #42 | #13 | GPT-5.2 |
| Adoption Rank | #42 | #13 | GPT-5.2 |
| Parameters | -- | -- | -- |
| Context Window | 400K | 400K | -- |
| Pricing | $1.25/$10.00/M | $1.75/$14.00/M | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 71 | 86 | GPT-5.2 |
| Context window size | 89 | 89 | GPT-5.1-Codex |
| Output Capacity | 85 | 85 | GPT-5.1-Codex |
| Pricing Tier | 10 | 14 | GPT-5.2 |
| Recency | 100 | 100 | GPT-5.1-Codex |
| Versatility | 50 | 67 | GPT-5.2 |
GPT-5.2 has a moderate advantage with a 6.200000000000003-point lead in composite score. It wins on more signal dimensions, but GPT-5.1-Codex has specific strengths that could make it the better choice for certain workflows.
Best for Quality
GPT-5.1-Codex
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Cost
GPT-5.1-Codex
29% lower pricing; better value at scale
Best for Reliability
GPT-5.1-Codex
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
GPT-5.1-Codex
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
GPT-5.1-Codex
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by OpenAI
GPT-5.2 currently scores higher (68 vs 62), but the best choice depends on your specific use case, budget, and requirements.
GPT-5.1-Codex is ranked #42 and GPT-5.2 is ranked #13. Rankings are based on a composite score from multiple signals including benchmarks, community sentiment, and adoption metrics.
Compare the detailed pricing breakdown above to see which model offers better value for your usage pattern.