| Signal | GPT-5.2 | Delta | GPT-5.2-Codex |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 86 | -- | |
Context window size | 89 | -- | |
Output Capacity | 85 | -- | |
Pricing Tier | 14 | -- | |
Recency | 100 | -- | |
Versatility | 67 | +17 | |
| Overall Result | 1 wins | of 6 | 0 wins |
17
days ranked higher
3
days
10
days ranked higher
OpenAI
OpenAI
| Metric | GPT-5.2 | GPT-5.2-Codex | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 68 | 67 | GPT-5.2 |
| Rank | #13 | #20 | GPT-5.2 |
| Quality Rank | #13 | #20 | GPT-5.2 |
| Adoption Rank | #13 | #20 | GPT-5.2 |
| Parameters | -- | -- | -- |
| Context Window | 400K | 400K | -- |
| Pricing | $1.75/$14.00/M | $1.75/$14.00/M | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 86 | 86 | GPT-5.2 |
| Context window size | 89 | 89 | GPT-5.2 |
| Output Capacity | 85 | 85 | GPT-5.2 |
| Pricing Tier | 14 | 14 | GPT-5.2 |
| Recency | 100 | 100 | GPT-5.2 |
| Versatility | 67 | 50 | GPT-5.2 |
GPT-5.2 and GPT-5.2-Codex are extremely close in overall performance (only 1.6000000000000085 points apart). Your best choice depends entirely on which specific strengths matter most for your use case.
Best for Quality
GPT-5.2
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Cost
GPT-5.2
0% lower pricing; better value at scale
Best for Reliability
GPT-5.2
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
GPT-5.2
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
GPT-5.2
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by OpenAI
GPT-5.2 currently scores higher (68 vs 67), but the best choice depends on your specific use case, budget, and requirements.
GPT-5.2 is ranked #13 and GPT-5.2-Codex is ranked #20. Rankings are based on a composite score from multiple signals including benchmarks, community sentiment, and adoption metrics.
Compare the detailed pricing breakdown above to see which model offers better value for your usage pattern.