| Signal | GPT-5.2 | Delta | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 86 | +29 | |
Context window size | 89 | +5 | |
Output Capacity | 85 | +2 | |
Pricing Tier | 14 | -86 | |
Recency | 100 | +31 | |
Versatility | 67 | -- | |
| Overall Result | 4 wins | of 6 | 1 wins |
0
days ranked higher
0
days
30
days ranked higher
OpenAI
OpenAI
GPT-5.2 saves you $44125.00/month
That's $529500.00/year compared to o1-pro at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.
| Metric | GPT-5.2 | o1-pro | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 68 | 77 | o1-pro |
| Rank | #13 | #5 | o1-pro |
| Quality Rank | #13 | #5 | o1-pro |
| Adoption Rank | #13 | #5 | o1-pro |
| Parameters | -- | -- | -- |
| Context Window | 400K | 200K | GPT-5.2 |
| Pricing | $1.75/$14.00/M | $150.00/$600.00/M | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 86 | 57 | GPT-5.2 |
| Context window size | 89 | 84 | GPT-5.2 |
| Output Capacity | 85 | 83 | GPT-5.2 |
| Pricing Tier | 14 | 100 | o1-pro |
| Recency | 100 | 69 | GPT-5.2 |
| Versatility | 67 | 67 | GPT-5.2 |
o1-pro has a moderate advantage with a 8.899999999999991-point lead in composite score. It wins on more signal dimensions, but GPT-5.2 has specific strengths that could make it the better choice for certain workflows.
Best for Quality
GPT-5.2
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Cost
GPT-5.2
98% lower pricing; better value at scale
Best for Reliability
GPT-5.2
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
GPT-5.2
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
GPT-5.2
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by OpenAI
o1-pro currently scores higher (77 vs 68), but the best choice depends on your specific use case, budget, and requirements.
GPT-5.2 is ranked #13 and o1-pro is ranked #5. Rankings are based on a composite score from multiple signals including benchmarks, community sentiment, and adoption metrics.
Compare the detailed pricing breakdown above to see which model offers better value for your usage pattern.