| Signal | GPT-5.2 | Delta | o3 Pro |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 86 | -- | |
Context window size | 89 | +5 | |
Output Capacity | 85 | +2 | |
Pricing Tier | 14 | -66 | |
Recency | 100 | +16 | |
Versatility | 67 | -- | |
| Overall Result | 3 wins | of 6 | 1 wins |
0
days ranked higher
0
days
30
days ranked higher
OpenAI
OpenAI
GPT-5.2 saves you $5125.00/month
That's $61500.00/year compared to o3 Pro at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.
| Metric | GPT-5.2 | o3 Pro | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 68 | 82 | o3 Pro |
| Rank | #13 | #3 | o3 Pro |
| Quality Rank | #13 | #3 | o3 Pro |
| Adoption Rank | #13 | #3 | o3 Pro |
| Parameters | -- | -- | -- |
| Context Window | 400K | 200K | GPT-5.2 |
| Pricing | $1.75/$14.00/M | $20.00/$80.00/M | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 86 | 86 | GPT-5.2 |
| Context window size | 89 | 84 | GPT-5.2 |
| Output Capacity | 85 | 83 | GPT-5.2 |
| Pricing Tier | 14 | 80 | o3 Pro |
| Recency | 100 | 84 | GPT-5.2 |
| Versatility | 67 | 67 | GPT-5.2 |
o3 Pro clearly outperforms GPT-5.2 with a significant 13.299999999999997-point lead. For most general use cases, o3 Pro is the stronger choice. However, GPT-5.2 may still excel in niche scenarios.
Best for Quality
GPT-5.2
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Cost
GPT-5.2
84% lower pricing; better value at scale
Best for Reliability
GPT-5.2
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
GPT-5.2
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
GPT-5.2
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by OpenAI
o3 Pro currently scores higher (82 vs 68), but the best choice depends on your specific use case, budget, and requirements.
GPT-5.2 is ranked #13 and o3 Pro is ranked #3. Rankings are based on a composite score from multiple signals including benchmarks, community sentiment, and adoption metrics.
Compare the detailed pricing breakdown above to see which model offers better value for your usage pattern.