| Signal | Llama 3.1 405B Instruct | Delta | GPT-4o |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 43 | -14 | |
Context window size | 81 | +0 | |
Output Capacity | 20 | -50 | |
Pricing Tier | 4 | -6 | |
Recency | 25 | +13 | |
Versatility | 33 | -33 | |
| Overall Result | 2 wins | of 6 | 4 wins |
0
days ranked higher
0
days
30
days ranked higher
Meta
OpenAI
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct saves you $150.00/month
That's $1800.00/year compared to GPT-4o at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.
| Metric | Llama 3.1 405B Instruct | GPT-4o | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 33 | 45 | GPT-4o |
| Rank | #262 | #188 | GPT-4o |
| Quality Rank | #262 | #188 | GPT-4o |
| Adoption Rank | #262 | #188 | GPT-4o |
| Parameters | 405B | -- | -- |
| Context Window | 131K | 128K | Llama 3.1 405B Instruct |
| Pricing | $4.00/$4.00/M | $2.50/$10.00/M | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 43 | 57 | GPT-4o |
| Context window size | 81 | 81 | Llama 3.1 405B Instruct |
| Output Capacity | 20 | 70 | GPT-4o |
| Pricing Tier | 4 | 10 | GPT-4o |
| Recency | 25 | 12 | Llama 3.1 405B Instruct |
| Versatility | 33 | 67 | GPT-4o |
GPT-4o clearly outperforms Llama 3.1 405B Instruct with a significant 11.5-point lead. For most general use cases, GPT-4o is the stronger choice. However, Llama 3.1 405B Instruct may still excel in niche scenarios.
Best for Quality
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Cost
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
36% lower pricing; better value at scale
Best for Reliability
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by Meta
| Capability | Llama 3.1 405B Instruct | GPT-4o |
|---|---|---|
| Vision (Image Input)differs | ||
| Function Calling | ||
| Streaming | ||
| JSON Mode | ||
| Reasoning | ||
| Web Search | ||
| Image Output |
Meta
OpenAI
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct saves you $4.50/month
That's 27% cheaper than GPT-4o at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.
Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.
| Parameter | Llama 3.1 405B Instruct | GPT-4o |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 131K | 128K |
| Max Output Tokens | -- | 16,384 |
| Open Source | Yes | Yes |
| Created | Jul 23, 2024 | May 13, 2024 |
GPT-4o currently scores higher (45 vs 33), but the best choice depends on your specific use case, budget, and requirements.
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is ranked #262 and GPT-4o is ranked #188. Rankings are based on a composite score from multiple signals including benchmarks, community sentiment, and adoption metrics.
Compare the detailed pricing breakdown above to see which model offers better value for your usage pattern.