| Signal | Devstral Medium | Delta | Qwen 3.5 397B |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 43 | +43 | |
Context window size | 81 | +81 | |
Output Capacity | 20 | +20 | |
Pricing Tier | 2 | +2 | |
Recency | 90 | +90 | |
Versatility | 33 | +33 | |
| Overall Result | 6 wins | of 6 | 0 wins |
0
days ranked higher
0
days
30
days ranked higher
Mistral AI
Alibaba
Pricing unavailable
| Metric | Devstral Medium | Qwen 3.5 397B | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 42 | 91 | Qwen 3.5 397B |
| Rank | #217 | #7 | Qwen 3.5 397B |
| Quality Rank | #217 | #7 | Qwen 3.5 397B |
| Adoption Rank | #217 | #8 | Qwen 3.5 397B |
| Parameters | -- | -- | -- |
| Context Window | 131K | 131K | -- |
| Pricing | $0.40/$2.00/M | -- | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 43 | -- | Devstral Medium |
| Context window size | 81 | -- | Devstral Medium |
| Output Capacity | 20 | -- | Devstral Medium |
| Pricing Tier | 2 | -- | Devstral Medium |
| Recency | 90 | -- | Devstral Medium |
| Versatility | 33 | -- | Devstral Medium |
Qwen 3.5 397B clearly outperforms Devstral Medium with a significant 48.8-point lead. For most general use cases, Qwen 3.5 397B is the stronger choice. However, Devstral Medium may still excel in niche scenarios.
Best for Quality
Devstral Medium
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Reliability
Devstral Medium
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
Devstral Medium
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
Devstral Medium
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by Mistral AI
Qwen 3.5 397B currently scores higher (91 vs 42), but the best choice depends on your specific use case, budget, and requirements.
Devstral Medium is ranked #217 and Qwen 3.5 397B is ranked #7. Rankings are based on a composite score from multiple signals including benchmarks, community sentiment, and adoption metrics.
Pricing information may not be available for both models. Check individual model pages for the latest pricing details.