| Signal | Mistral Small 3 | Delta | Qwen 3.5 397B |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 43 | +43 | |
Context window size | 72 | +72 | |
Output Capacity | 70 | +70 | |
Pricing Tier | 0 | +0 | |
Recency | 61 | +61 | |
Versatility | 33 | +33 | |
| Overall Result | 6 wins | of 6 | 0 wins |
0
days ranked higher
0
days
30
days ranked higher
Mistral AI
Alibaba
Pricing unavailable
| Metric | Mistral Small 3 | Qwen 3.5 397B | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 41 | 91 | Qwen 3.5 397B |
| Rank | #227 | #7 | Qwen 3.5 397B |
| Quality Rank | #227 | #7 | Qwen 3.5 397B |
| Adoption Rank | #227 | #8 | Qwen 3.5 397B |
| Parameters | -- | -- | -- |
| Context Window | 33K | 131K | Qwen 3.5 397B |
| Pricing | $0.05/$0.08/M | -- | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 43 | -- | Mistral Small 3 |
| Context window size | 72 | -- | Mistral Small 3 |
| Output Capacity | 70 | -- | Mistral Small 3 |
| Pricing Tier | 0 | -- | Mistral Small 3 |
| Recency | 61 | -- | Mistral Small 3 |
| Versatility | 33 | -- | Mistral Small 3 |
Qwen 3.5 397B clearly outperforms Mistral Small 3 with a significant 50.1-point lead. For most general use cases, Qwen 3.5 397B is the stronger choice. However, Mistral Small 3 may still excel in niche scenarios.
Best for Quality
Mistral Small 3
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Reliability
Mistral Small 3
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
Mistral Small 3
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
Mistral Small 3
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by Mistral AI
Qwen 3.5 397B currently scores higher (91 vs 41), but the best choice depends on your specific use case, budget, and requirements.
Mistral Small 3 is ranked #227 and Qwen 3.5 397B is ranked #7. Rankings are based on a composite score from multiple signals including benchmarks, community sentiment, and adoption metrics.
Pricing information may not be available for both models. Check individual model pages for the latest pricing details.