| Signal | o1-pro | Delta | o3 |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 57 | -29 | |
Context window size | 84 | -- | |
Output Capacity | 83 | -- | |
Pricing Tier | 100 | +92 | |
Recency | 69 | -5 | |
Versatility | 67 | -- | |
| Overall Result | 1 wins | of 6 | 2 wins |
30
days ranked higher
0
days
0
days ranked higher
OpenAI
OpenAI
o3 saves you $44400.00/month
That's $532800.00/year compared to o1-pro at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.
| Metric | o1-pro | o3 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 77 | 62 | o1-pro |
| Rank | #5 | #44 | o1-pro |
| Quality Rank | #5 | #44 | o1-pro |
| Adoption Rank | #5 | #44 | o1-pro |
| Parameters | -- | -- | -- |
| Context Window | 200K | 200K | -- |
| Pricing | $150.00/$600.00/M | $2.00/$8.00/M | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 57 | 86 | o3 |
| Context window size | 84 | 84 | o1-pro |
| Output Capacity | 83 | 83 | o1-pro |
| Pricing Tier | 100 | 8 | o1-pro |
| Recency | 69 | 74 | o3 |
| Versatility | 67 | 67 | o1-pro |
o1-pro clearly outperforms o3 with a significant 15.099999999999994-point lead. For most general use cases, o1-pro is the stronger choice. However, o3 may still excel in niche scenarios.
Best for Quality
o1-pro
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Cost
o3
99% lower pricing; better value at scale
Best for Reliability
o1-pro
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
o1-pro
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
o1-pro
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by OpenAI
o1-pro currently scores higher (77 vs 62), but the best choice depends on your specific use case, budget, and requirements.
o1-pro is ranked #5 and o3 is ranked #44. Rankings are based on a composite score from multiple signals including benchmarks, community sentiment, and adoption metrics.
Compare the detailed pricing breakdown above to see which model offers better value for your usage pattern.