| Signal | o1 | Delta | Claude 3.5 Sonnet |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 57 | +14 | |
Context window size | 84 | -- | |
Output Capacity | 83 | +18 | |
Pricing Tier | 60 | +30 | |
Recency | 52 | +10 | |
Versatility | 67 | -- | |
| Overall Result | 4 wins | of 6 | 0 wins |
30
days ranked higher
0
days
0
days ranked higher
OpenAI
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Sonnet saves you $2400.00/month
That's $28800.00/year compared to o1 at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.
| Metric | o1 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 65 | 50 | o1 |
| Rank | #28 | #114 | o1 |
| Quality Rank | #28 | #114 | o1 |
| Adoption Rank | #28 | #114 | o1 |
| Parameters | -- | -- | -- |
| Context Window | 200K | 200K | -- |
| Pricing | $15.00/$60.00/M | $6.00/$30.00/M | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 57 | 43 | o1 |
| Context window size | 84 | 84 | o1 |
| Output Capacity | 83 | 65 | o1 |
| Pricing Tier | 60 | 30 | o1 |
| Recency | 52 | 42 | o1 |
| Versatility | 67 | 67 | o1 |
o1 clearly outperforms Claude 3.5 Sonnet with a significant 14.400000000000006-point lead. For most general use cases, o1 is the stronger choice. However, Claude 3.5 Sonnet may still excel in niche scenarios.
Best for Quality
o1
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Cost
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
52% lower pricing; better value at scale
Best for Reliability
o1
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
o1
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
o1
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by OpenAI
| Capability | o1 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet |
|---|---|---|
| Vision (Image Input) | ||
| Function Calling | ||
| Streaming | ||
| JSON Modediffers | ||
| Reasoning | ||
| Web Search | ||
| Image Output |
OpenAI
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Sonnet saves you $52.20/month
That's 53% cheaper than o1 at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.
Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.
| Parameter | o1 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 200K | 200K |
| Max Output Tokens | 100,000 | 8,192 |
| Open Source | No | Yes |
| Created | Dec 17, 2024 | Oct 22, 2024 |
o1 currently scores higher (65 vs 50), but the best choice depends on your specific use case, budget, and requirements.
o1 is ranked #28 and Claude 3.5 Sonnet is ranked #114. Rankings are based on a composite score from multiple signals including benchmarks, community sentiment, and adoption metrics.
Compare the detailed pricing breakdown above to see which model offers better value for your usage pattern.