| Signal | o3 Pro | Delta | Qwen 3.5 397B |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 86 | +86 | |
Context window size | 84 | +84 | |
Output Capacity | 83 | +83 | |
Pricing Tier | 80 | +80 | |
Recency | 84 | +84 | |
Versatility | 67 | +67 | |
| Overall Result | 6 wins | of 6 | 0 wins |
0
days ranked higher
0
days
30
days ranked higher
OpenAI
Alibaba
Pricing unavailable
| Metric | o3 Pro | Qwen 3.5 397B | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 82 | 91 | Qwen 3.5 397B |
| Rank | #3 | #7 | o3 Pro |
| Quality Rank | #3 | #7 | o3 Pro |
| Adoption Rank | #3 | #8 | o3 Pro |
| Parameters | -- | -- | -- |
| Context Window | 200K | 131K | o3 Pro |
| Pricing | $20.00/$80.00/M | -- | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 86 | -- | o3 Pro |
| Context window size | 84 | -- | o3 Pro |
| Output Capacity | 83 | -- | o3 Pro |
| Pricing Tier | 80 | -- | o3 Pro |
| Recency | 84 | -- | o3 Pro |
| Versatility | 67 | -- | o3 Pro |
Qwen 3.5 397B has a moderate advantage with a 9.299999999999997-point lead in composite score. It wins on more signal dimensions, but o3 Pro has specific strengths that could make it the better choice for certain workflows.
by OpenAI
Qwen 3.5 397B currently scores higher (91 vs 82), but the best choice depends on your specific use case, budget, and requirements.
o3 Pro is ranked #3 and Qwen 3.5 397B is ranked #7. Rankings are based on a composite score from multiple signals including benchmarks, community sentiment, and adoption metrics.
Pricing information may not be available for both models. Check individual model pages for the latest pricing details.