| Signal | o3 | Delta | Qwen3.5 397B A17B |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 86 | +14 | |
Context window size | 84 | -2 | |
Output Capacity | 83 | +3 | |
Pricing Tier | 8 | +5 | |
Recency | 74 | -26 | |
Versatility | 67 | -- | |
| Overall Result | 3 wins | of 6 | 2 wins |
10
days ranked higher
5
days
15
days ranked higher
OpenAI
Alibaba
Qwen3.5 397B A17B saves you $370.00/month
That's $4440.00/year compared to o3 at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.
| Metric | o3 | Qwen3.5 397B A17B | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 62 | 61 | o3 |
| Rank | #44 | #46 | o3 |
| Quality Rank | #44 | #46 | o3 |
| Adoption Rank | #44 | #46 | o3 |
| Parameters | -- | -- | -- |
| Context Window | 200K | 262K | Qwen3.5 397B A17B |
| Pricing | $2.00/$8.00/M | $0.55/$3.50/M | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 86 | 71 | o3 |
| Context window size | 84 | 86 | Qwen3.5 397B A17B |
| Output Capacity | 83 | 80 | o3 |
| Pricing Tier | 8 | 4 | o3 |
| Recency | 74 | 100 | Qwen3.5 397B A17B |
| Versatility | 67 | 67 | o3 |
o3 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B are extremely close in overall performance (only 0.9000000000000057 points apart). Your best choice depends entirely on which specific strengths matter most for your use case.
Best for Quality
o3
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Cost
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
60% lower pricing; better value at scale
Best for Reliability
o3
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
o3
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
o3
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by OpenAI
o3 currently scores higher (62 vs 61), but the best choice depends on your specific use case, budget, and requirements.
o3 is ranked #44 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B is ranked #46. Rankings are based on a composite score from multiple signals including benchmarks, community sentiment, and adoption metrics.
Compare the detailed pricing breakdown above to see which model offers better value for your usage pattern.