| Signal | Gemini 3 Pro Preview | Delta | GPT-5.4 Mini |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 83 | -17 | |
Benchmarks | 89 | -2 | |
Pricing | 12 | +8 | |
Context window size | 96 | +7 | |
Recency | 100 | -- | |
Output Capacity | 80 | -5 | |
| Overall Result | 2 wins | of 6 | 3 wins |
5
days ranked higher
0
days
25
days ranked higher
OpenAI
GPT-5.4 Mini saves you $500.00/month
That's $6000.00/year compared to Gemini 3 Pro Preview at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.
| Metric | Gemini 3 Pro Preview | GPT-5.4 Mini | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 90 | 93 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| Rank | #10 | #3 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| Quality Rank | #10 | #3 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| Adoption Rank | #10 | #3 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| Parameters | -- | -- | -- |
| Context Window | 1049K | 400K | Gemini 3 Pro Preview |
| Pricing | $2.00/$12.00/M | $0.75/$4.50/M | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 83 | 100 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| Benchmarks | 89 | 90 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| Pricing | 12 | 5 | Gemini 3 Pro Preview |
| Context window size | 96 | 89 | Gemini 3 Pro Preview |
| Recency | 100 | 100 | Gemini 3 Pro Preview |
| Output Capacity | 80 | 85 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
Our composite score (0–100) combines six weighted signals: benchmark performance (25%), pricing efficiency (25%), context window size (15%), model recency (15%), output capacity (10%), and capability versatility (10%). Here's what the scores mean for these two models:
Scores 90/100 (rank #10), placing it in the top 97% of all 290 models tracked.
Scores 93/100 (rank #3), placing it in the top 99% of all 290 models tracked.
With only a 3-point gap, these models are in the same performance tier. The practical difference in output quality is minimal - your choice should depend on pricing, latency requirements, and specific feature needs.
GPT-5.4 Mini offers 63% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $78.75/month with GPT-5.4 Mini vs $210.00/month with Gemini 3 Pro Preview - a $131.25 monthly difference.
Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.
When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.
Code generation & review
Higher benchmark score (0/100) indicates stronger performance on coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring
Customer support chatbot
Faster response time (speed score 0/100) is critical for user-facing chat. GPT-5.4 Mini also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support
Long document analysis
Larger context window (1049K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass
Batch data extraction
Lower output pricing ($4.50/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily
Creative writing & content
Higher overall composite score (93/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content
Image understanding & OCR
Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly
Gemini 3 Pro Preview and GPT-5.4 Mini are extremely close in overall performance (only 3 points apart). Your best choice depends entirely on which specific strengths matter most for your use case.
Best for Quality
Gemini 3 Pro Preview
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Cost
GPT-5.4 Mini
63% lower pricing; better value at scale
Best for Reliability
Gemini 3 Pro Preview
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
Gemini 3 Pro Preview
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
Gemini 3 Pro Preview
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by Google
| Capability | Gemini 3 Pro Preview | GPT-5.4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Vision (Image Input) | ||
| Function Calling | ||
| Streaming | ||
| JSON Mode | ||
| Reasoning | ||
| Web Searchdiffers | ||
| Image Output |
OpenAI
GPT-5.4 Mini saves you $11.25/month
That's 63% cheaper than Gemini 3 Pro Preview at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.
Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.
| Parameter | Gemini 3 Pro Preview | GPT-5.4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 1.0M | 400K |
| Max Output Tokens | 65,536 | 128,000 |
| Open Source | No | No |
| Created | Nov 18, 2025 | Mar 17, 2026 |
GPT-5.4 Mini scores 93/100 (rank #3) compared to Gemini 3 Pro Preview's 90/100 (rank #10), giving it a 3-point advantage. GPT-5.4 Mini is the stronger overall choice, though Gemini 3 Pro Preview may excel in specific areas like certain benchmarks.
Gemini 3 Pro Preview is ranked #10 and GPT-5.4 Mini is ranked #3 out of 290+ AI models. Rankings use a composite score combining benchmark performance (25%), pricing (25%), context window (15%), recency (15%), output capacity (10%), and versatility (10%). Scores update hourly.
GPT-5.4 Mini is cheaper at $4.50/M output tokens vs Gemini 3 Pro Preview's $12.00/M output tokens - 2.7x more expensive. Input token pricing: Gemini 3 Pro Preview at $2.00/M vs GPT-5.4 Mini at $0.75/M.
Gemini 3 Pro Preview has a larger context window of 1,048,576 tokens compared to GPT-5.4 Mini's 400,000 tokens. A larger context window means the model can process longer documents and conversations.