| Signal | GPT-5 Pro | Delta | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 100 | +33 | |
Benchmarks | 88 | +88 | |
Pricing | 100 | +98 | |
Context window size | 89 | +8 | |
Recency | 100 | +8 | |
Output Capacity | 85 | +65 | |
| Overall Result | 6 wins | of 6 | 0 wins |
30
days ranked higher
0
days
0
days ranked higher
OpenAI
Mistral AI
Mistral Medium 3.1 saves you $7360.00/month
That's $88320.00/year compared to GPT-5 Pro at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.
| Metric | GPT-5 Pro | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 92 | 70 | GPT-5 Pro |
| Rank | #7 | #151 | GPT-5 Pro |
| Quality Rank | #7 | #151 | GPT-5 Pro |
| Adoption Rank | #7 | #151 | GPT-5 Pro |
| Parameters | -- | -- | -- |
| Context Window | 400K | 131K | GPT-5 Pro |
| Pricing | $15.00/$120.00/M | $0.40/$2.00/M | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 100 | 67 | GPT-5 Pro |
| Benchmarks | 88 | -- | GPT-5 Pro |
| Pricing | 100 | 2 | GPT-5 Pro |
| Context window size | 89 | 81 | GPT-5 Pro |
| Recency | 100 | 93 | GPT-5 Pro |
| Output Capacity | 85 | 20 | GPT-5 Pro |
Our composite score (0–100) combines six weighted signals: benchmark performance (25%), pricing efficiency (25%), context window size (15%), model recency (15%), output capacity (10%), and capability versatility (10%). Here's what the scores mean for these two models:
Scores 92/100 (rank #7), placing it in the top 98% of all 290 models tracked.
Scores 70/100 (rank #151), placing it in the top 48% of all 290 models tracked.
GPT-5 Pro has a 22-point advantage, which typically translates to noticeably stronger performance on complex reasoning, code generation, and multi-step tasks.
Mistral Medium 3.1 offers 98% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $36.00/month with Mistral Medium 3.1 vs $2025.00/month with GPT-5 Pro - a $1989.00 monthly difference.
Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.
When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.
Code generation & review
Higher benchmark score (0/100) indicates stronger performance on coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring
Customer support chatbot
Faster response time (speed score 0/100) is critical for user-facing chat. Mistral Medium 3.1 also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support
Long document analysis
Larger context window (400K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass
Batch data extraction
Lower output pricing ($2.00/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily
Creative writing & content
Higher overall composite score (92/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content
Image understanding & OCR
Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly
GPT-5 Pro clearly outperforms Mistral Medium 3.1 with a significant 21.60000000000001-point lead. For most general use cases, GPT-5 Pro is the stronger choice. However, Mistral Medium 3.1 may still excel in niche scenarios.
Best for Quality
GPT-5 Pro
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Cost
Mistral Medium 3.1
98% lower pricing; better value at scale
Best for Reliability
GPT-5 Pro
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
GPT-5 Pro
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
GPT-5 Pro
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by OpenAI
| Capability | GPT-5 Pro | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Vision (Image Input) | ||
| Function Calling | ||
| Streaming | ||
| JSON Mode | ||
| Reasoningdiffers | ||
| Web Searchdiffers | ||
| Image Output |
OpenAI
Mistral AI
Mistral Medium 3.1 saves you $167.88/month
That's 98% cheaper than GPT-5 Pro at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.
Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.
| Parameter | GPT-5 Pro | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 400K | 131K |
| Max Output Tokens | 128,000 | -- |
| Open Source | No | No |
| Created | Oct 6, 2025 | Aug 13, 2025 |
GPT-5 Pro scores 92/100 (rank #7) compared to Mistral Medium 3.1's 70/100 (rank #151), giving it a 22-point advantage. GPT-5 Pro is the stronger overall choice, though Mistral Medium 3.1 may excel in specific areas like cost efficiency.
GPT-5 Pro is ranked #7 and Mistral Medium 3.1 is ranked #151 out of 290+ AI models. Rankings use a composite score combining benchmark performance (25%), pricing (25%), context window (15%), recency (15%), output capacity (10%), and versatility (10%). Scores update hourly.
Mistral Medium 3.1 is cheaper at $2.00/M output tokens vs GPT-5 Pro's $120.00/M output tokens - 60.0x more expensive. Input token pricing: GPT-5 Pro at $15.00/M vs Mistral Medium 3.1 at $0.40/M.
GPT-5 Pro has a larger context window of 400,000 tokens compared to Mistral Medium 3.1's 131,072 tokens. A larger context window means the model can process longer documents and conversations.