| Signal | Grok 3 Mini | Delta | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 83 | +17 | |
Benchmarks | 77 | +77 | |
Pricing | 1 | +0 | |
Context window size | 81 | -5 | |
Recency | 81 | -19 | |
Output Capacity | 20 | -- | |
| Overall Result | 3 wins | of 6 | 2 wins |
20
days ranked higher
4
days
6
days ranked higher
xAI
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B saves you $40.00/month
That's $480.00/year compared to Grok 3 Mini at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.
| Metric | Grok 3 Mini | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 76 | 74 | Grok 3 Mini |
| Rank | #103 | #121 | Grok 3 Mini |
| Quality Rank | #103 | #121 | Grok 3 Mini |
| Adoption Rank | #103 | #121 | Grok 3 Mini |
| Parameters | -- | 30B | -- |
| Context Window | 131K | 262K | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B |
| Pricing | $0.30/$0.50/M | $0.05/$0.20/M | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 83 | 67 | Grok 3 Mini |
| Benchmarks | 77 | -- | Grok 3 Mini |
| Pricing | 1 | 0 | Grok 3 Mini |
| Context window size | 81 | 86 | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B |
| Recency | 81 | 100 | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B |
| Output Capacity | 20 | 20 | Grok 3 Mini |
Our composite score (0–100) combines six weighted signals: benchmark performance (25%), pricing efficiency (25%), context window size (15%), model recency (15%), output capacity (10%), and capability versatility (10%). Here's what the scores mean for these two models:
Scores 76/100 (rank #103), placing it in the top 65% of all 290 models tracked.
Scores 74/100 (rank #121), placing it in the top 59% of all 290 models tracked.
With only a 3-point gap, these models are in the same performance tier. The practical difference in output quality is minimal - your choice should depend on pricing, latency requirements, and specific feature needs.
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B offers 69% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $3.75/month with Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs $12.00/month with Grok 3 Mini - a $8.25 monthly difference.
Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.
When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.
Code generation & review
Higher benchmark score (0/100) indicates stronger performance on coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring
Customer support chatbot
Faster response time (speed score 0/100) is critical for user-facing chat. Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support
Long document analysis
Larger context window (262K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass
Batch data extraction
Lower output pricing ($0.20/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily
Creative writing & content
Higher overall composite score (76/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content
Grok 3 Mini and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B are extremely close in overall performance (only 2.700000000000003 points apart). Your best choice depends entirely on which specific strengths matter most for your use case.
Best for Quality
Grok 3 Mini
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Cost
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
69% lower pricing; better value at scale
Best for Reliability
Grok 3 Mini
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
Grok 3 Mini
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
Grok 3 Mini
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by xAI
| Capability | Grok 3 Mini | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Vision (Image Input) | ||
| Function Calling | ||
| Streaming | ||
| JSON Mode | ||
| Reasoning | ||
| Web Searchdiffers | ||
| Image Output |
xAI
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B saves you $0.8100/month
That's 71% cheaper than Grok 3 Mini at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.
Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.
| Parameter | Grok 3 Mini | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 131K | 262K |
| Max Output Tokens | -- | -- |
| Open Source | No | Yes |
| Created | Jun 10, 2025 | Dec 14, 2025 |
Grok 3 Mini scores 76/100 (rank #103) compared to Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B's 74/100 (rank #121), giving it a 3-point advantage. Grok 3 Mini is the stronger overall choice, though Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B may excel in specific areas like cost efficiency.
Grok 3 Mini is ranked #103 and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is ranked #121 out of 290+ AI models. Rankings use a composite score combining benchmark performance (25%), pricing (25%), context window (15%), recency (15%), output capacity (10%), and versatility (10%). Scores update hourly.
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is cheaper at $0.20/M output tokens vs Grok 3 Mini's $0.50/M output tokens - 2.5x more expensive. Input token pricing: Grok 3 Mini at $0.30/M vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B at $0.05/M.
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B has a larger context window of 262,144 tokens compared to Grok 3 Mini's 131,072 tokens. A larger context window means the model can process longer documents and conversations.