Track the latest open source AI model releases and rankings. Currently monitoring 181 open source models across 31 providers, updated hourly with scores, specs, and head-to-head comparisons.
Open Source Models
181
% of All Models
57%
Top Provider
Alibaba
Avg Score
62
| Model | Score | Released |
|---|---|---|
| Nemotron 3 Super (free)FreeNVIDIA | 88 | Mar 11, 2026 |
| Seed-2.0-LiteByteDance | 88 | Mar 10, 2026 |
| Qwen3.5-9BAlibaba | 78 | Mar 10, 2026 |
| Mercury 2Inception | 78 | Mar 4, 2026 |
| Qwen3.5-35B-A3BAlibaba | 87 | Feb 25, 2026 |
| Qwen3.5-27BAlibaba | 87 | Feb 25, 2026 |
| Qwen3.5-122B-A10BAlibaba | 87 | Feb 25, 2026 |
| Qwen3.5-FlashAlibaba | 89 | Feb 25, 2026 |
| LFM2-24B-A2BLiquid AI | 45 | Feb 25, 2026 |
| Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom ToolsGoogle | 89 | Feb 25, 2026 |
| Aion-2.0aion-labs | 63 | Feb 23, 2026 |
| Qwen3.5 397B A17BAlibaba | 87 | Feb 16, 2026 |
| MiniMax M2.5 (free)FreeMiniMax | 80 | Feb 12, 2026 |
| MiniMax M2.5MiniMax | 80 | Feb 12, 2026 |
| Qwen3 Max ThinkingAlibaba | 79 | Feb 9, 2026 |
| Qwen3 Coder NextAlibaba | 72 | Feb 4, 2026 |
| Step 3.5 Flash (free)FreeStepFun | 73 | Jan 29, 2026 |
| Step 3.5 FlashStepFun | 73 | Jan 29, 2026 |
| Trinity Large Preview (free)Freearcee-ai | 69 | Jan 27, 2026 |
| Kimi K2.5Moonshot AI | 87 | Jan 27, 2026 |
| LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking (free)FreeLiquid AI | 52 | Jan 20, 2026 |
| LFM2.5-1.2B-Instruct (free)FreeLiquid AI | 45 | Jan 20, 2026 |
| # | Model | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom ToolsGoogle | 89 |
| 2 | Qwen3.5-FlashAlibaba | 89 |
| 3 | Nemotron 3 Super (free)FreeNVIDIA | 88 |
| 4 | Seed-2.0-LiteByteDance | 88 |
| 5 | Qwen3.5-35B-A3BAlibaba | 87 |
| 6 | Qwen3.5-27BAlibaba | 87 |
| 7 | Qwen3.5-122B-A10BAlibaba | 87 |
| 8 | Qwen3.5 397B A17BAlibaba | 87 |
| 9 | Kimi K2.5Moonshot AI | 87 |
| 10 | Qwen3 VL 8B ThinkingAlibaba | 85 |
| 11 | Qwen3 VL 30B A3B ThinkingAlibaba | 85 |
| 12 | Qwen3 VL 235B A22B ThinkingAlibaba | 85 |
| 13 | MiniMax M2.5 (free)FreeMiniMax | 80 |
| 14 | MiniMax M2.5MiniMax | 80 |
| 15 | MiniMax M2MiniMax | 80 |
| 16 | MiMo-V2-FlashXiaomi | 79 |
| 17 | Trinity Miniarcee-ai | 79 |
| 18 | Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL (free)FreeNVIDIA | 79 |
| 19 | Tongyi DeepResearch 30B A3BAlibaba | 79 |
| 20 | Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Alibaba | 79 |
Dive deeper into rankings, latest releases, and the full open source ecosystem.
The top open source AI models in 2026 include DeepSeek, Llama 4, Qwen, Mistral, and Gemma. Rankings are based on a composite score that factors in capabilities, pricing, context window, recency, output capacity, and versatility. Check the leaderboard above for the latest rankings updated hourly.
Open source LLMs have closed the gap significantly. Models like DeepSeek R1 and Llama 4 Maverick compete on benchmarks with proprietary models while offering advantages like self-hosting, fine-tuning, and no per-token API costs at scale. Proprietary models still lead in some areas like instruction following and safety alignment.
Yes. Open source models with open weights can be self-hosted on your own infrastructure using tools like vLLM, Ollama, TGI, or llama.cpp. This gives you full data privacy, no vendor lock-in, and fixed infrastructure costs instead of per-token pricing.
Open weight models release the trained model weights for download and use, but may not release the full training code or data. Fully open source models release everything including training code, data, and weights. Both allow self-hosting and inference, but only fully open source models allow complete reproducibility.
Our rankings refresh hourly using live data from the OpenRouter API. We track new model releases, pricing changes, and capability updates automatically. The composite score is recalculated each time to reflect the latest information.
Many open source models are free when self-hosted (you pay only for compute). When accessed via API providers like OpenRouter, Together AI, or Groq, they typically have much lower per-token costs than proprietary models. Some providers offer free tiers for popular open source models.
The open source AI ecosystem is growing faster than ever. In 2026, models from Meta (Llama 4), DeepSeek, Alibaba (Qwen), Mistral, and Google (Gemma) compete head-to-head with proprietary offerings from OpenAI and Anthropic. This page tracks every open source model release as it happens, scoring each on a 0-100 composite scale that factors in capabilities, pricing, context window, recency, and output capacity.
Open source models offer key advantages: full data privacy through self-hosting, no vendor lock-in, the ability to fine-tune on proprietary data, and predictable infrastructure costs instead of per-token API pricing. For organizations with strict compliance requirements or high-volume workloads, open source LLMs are often the most practical choice.
Whether you are evaluating the latest DeepSeek release, comparing Llama variants, or deciding between open source and proprietary models for your next project, this page gives you the data you need to make an informed decision.