| Signal | GPT-5.4 Pro | Delta | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 100 | +17 | |
Pricing | 100 | +100 | |
Context window size | 96 | +0 | |
Recency | 100 | -- | |
Output Capacity | 85 | +5 | |
| Overall Result | 4 wins | of 5 | 0 wins |
30
days ranked higher
0
days
0
days ranked higher
OpenAI
Alibaba
Qwen3.5-Flash saves you $11970.00/month
That's $143640.00/year compared to GPT-5.4 Pro at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.
| Metric | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen3.5-Flash | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 97 | 89 | GPT-5.4 Pro |
| Rank | #1 | #33 | GPT-5.4 Pro |
| Quality Rank | #1 | #33 | GPT-5.4 Pro |
| Adoption Rank | #1 | #33 | GPT-5.4 Pro |
| Parameters | -- | -- | -- |
| Context Window | 1050K | 1000K | GPT-5.4 Pro |
| Pricing | $30.00/$180.00/M | $0.10/$0.40/M | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 100 | 83 | GPT-5.4 Pro |
| Pricing | 100 | 0 | GPT-5.4 Pro |
| Context window size | 96 | 95 | GPT-5.4 Pro |
| Recency | 100 | 100 | GPT-5.4 Pro |
| Output Capacity | 85 | 80 | GPT-5.4 Pro |
Our composite score (0–100) combines six weighted signals: benchmark performance (25%), pricing efficiency (25%), context window size (15%), model recency (15%), output capacity (10%), and capability versatility (10%). Here's what the scores mean for these two models:
Scores 97/100 (rank #1), placing it in the top 100% of all 290 models tracked.
Scores 89/100 (rank #33), placing it in the top 89% of all 290 models tracked.
GPT-5.4 Pro has a 8-point advantage, which typically translates to noticeably better performance on complex reasoning, code generation, and multi-step tasks.
Qwen3.5-Flash offers 100% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $7.50/month with Qwen3.5-Flash vs $3150.00/month with GPT-5.4 Pro — a $3142.50 monthly difference.
Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.
When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.
Code generation & review
Higher benchmark score (0/100) indicates stronger performance on coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring
Customer support chatbot
Faster response time (speed score 0/100) is critical for user-facing chat. Qwen3.5-Flash also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support
Long document analysis
Larger context window (1050K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass
Batch data extraction
Lower output pricing ($0.40/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily
Creative writing & content
Higher overall composite score (97/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content
Image understanding & OCR
Supports vision input — can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly
GPT-5.4 Pro has a moderate advantage with a 8.300000000000011-point lead in composite score. It wins on more signal dimensions, but Qwen3.5-Flash has specific strengths that could make it the better choice for certain workflows.
Best for Quality
GPT-5.4 Pro
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Cost
Qwen3.5-Flash
100% lower pricing; better value at scale
Best for Reliability
GPT-5.4 Pro
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
GPT-5.4 Pro
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
GPT-5.4 Pro
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by OpenAI
| Capability | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Vision (Image Input) | ||
| Function Calling | ||
| Streaming | ||
| JSON Mode | ||
| Reasoning | ||
| Web Searchdiffers | ||
| Image Output |
OpenAI
Alibaba
Qwen3.5-Flash saves you $269.34/month
That's 100% cheaper than GPT-5.4 Pro at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.
Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.
| Parameter | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 1.1M | 1M |
| Max Output Tokens | 128,000 | 65,536 |
| Open Source | No | Yes |
| Created | Mar 5, 2026 | Feb 25, 2026 |
GPT-5.4 Pro scores 97/100 (rank #1) compared to Qwen3.5-Flash's 89/100 (rank #33), giving it a 8-point advantage. GPT-5.4 Pro is the stronger overall choice, though Qwen3.5-Flash may excel in specific areas like cost efficiency.
GPT-5.4 Pro is ranked #1 and Qwen3.5-Flash is ranked #33 out of 290+ AI models. Rankings use a composite score combining benchmark performance (25%), pricing (25%), context window (15%), recency (15%), output capacity (10%), and versatility (10%). Scores update hourly.
Qwen3.5-Flash is cheaper at $0.40/M output tokens vs GPT-5.4 Pro's $180.00/M output tokens — 450.0x more expensive. Input token pricing: GPT-5.4 Pro at $30.00/M vs Qwen3.5-Flash at $0.10/M.
GPT-5.4 Pro has a larger context window of 1,050,000 tokens compared to Qwen3.5-Flash's 1,000,000 tokens. A larger context window means the model can process longer documents and conversations.