| Signal | Grok 3 | Delta | Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 67 | -17 | |
Pricing | 15 | +12 | |
Context window size | 81 | -- | |
Recency | 82 | -18 | |
Output Capacity | 20 | -55 | |
| Overall Result | 1 wins | of 5 | 3 wins |
0
days ranked higher
0
days
30
days ranked higher
xAI
Alibaba
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking saves you $894.00/month
That's $10728.00/year compared to Grok 3 at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.
| Metric | Grok 3 | Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 66 | 85 | Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking |
| Rank | #161 | #54 | Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking |
| Quality Rank | #161 | #54 | Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking |
| Adoption Rank | #161 | #54 | Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking |
| Parameters | -- | 235B | -- |
| Context Window | 131K | 131K | -- |
| Pricing | $3.00/$15.00/M | $0.26/$2.60/M | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 67 | 83 | Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking |
| Pricing | 15 | 3 | Grok 3 |
| Context window size | 81 | 81 | Grok 3 |
| Recency | 82 | 100 | Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking |
| Output Capacity | 20 | 75 | Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking |
Our composite score (0–100) combines six weighted signals: benchmark performance (25%), pricing efficiency (25%), context window size (15%), model recency (15%), output capacity (10%), and capability versatility (10%). Here's what the scores mean for these two models:
Scores 66/100 (rank #161), placing it in the top 45% of all 290 models tracked.
Scores 85/100 (rank #54), placing it in the top 82% of all 290 models tracked.
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking has a 19-point advantage, which typically translates to noticeably stronger performance on complex reasoning, code generation, and multi-step tasks.
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking offers 84% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $42.90/month with Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking vs $270.00/month with Grok 3 — a $227.10 monthly difference.
Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.
When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.
Code generation & review
Higher benchmark score (0/100) indicates stronger performance on coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring
Customer support chatbot
Faster response time (speed score 0/100) is critical for user-facing chat. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support
Long document analysis
Larger context window (131K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass
Batch data extraction
Lower output pricing ($2.60/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily
Creative writing & content
Higher overall composite score (85/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content
Image understanding & OCR
Supports vision input — can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking clearly outperforms Grok 3 with a significant 19.299999999999997-point lead. For most general use cases, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is the stronger choice. However, Grok 3 may still excel in niche scenarios.
Best for Quality
Grok 3
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Cost
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
84% lower pricing; better value at scale
Best for Reliability
Grok 3
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
Grok 3
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
Grok 3
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by xAI
by Alibaba
| Capability | Grok 3 | Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Vision (Image Input)differs | ||
| Function Calling | ||
| Streaming | ||
| JSON Mode | ||
| Reasoningdiffers | ||
| Web Searchdiffers | ||
| Image Output |
xAI
Alibaba
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking saves you $19.81/month
That's 85% cheaper than Grok 3 at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.
Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.
| Parameter | Grok 3 | Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 131K | 131K |
| Max Output Tokens | -- | 32,768 |
| Open Source | No | Yes |
| Created | Jun 10, 2025 | Sep 23, 2025 |
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking scores 85/100 (rank #54) compared to Grok 3's 66/100 (rank #161), giving it a 19-point advantage. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is the stronger overall choice, though Grok 3 may excel in specific areas like certain benchmarks.
Grok 3 is ranked #161 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is ranked #54 out of 290+ AI models. Rankings use a composite score combining benchmark performance (25%), pricing (25%), context window (15%), recency (15%), output capacity (10%), and versatility (10%). Scores update hourly.
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is cheaper at $2.60/M output tokens vs Grok 3's $15.00/M output tokens — 5.8x more expensive. Input token pricing: Grok 3 at $3.00/M vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking at $0.26/M.
Grok 3 has a larger context window of 131,072 tokens compared to Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking's 131,072 tokens. A larger context window means the model can process longer documents and conversations.