| Signal | Devstral 2 2512 | Delta | R1 |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 50 | -- | |
Pricing | 2 | 0 | |
Context window size | 86 | +10 | |
Recency | 100 | +44 | |
Output Capacity | 20 | -50 | |
Benchmarks | 0 | -80 | |
| Overall Result | 2 wins | of 6 | 3 wins |
4
days ranked higher
1
days
25
days ranked higher
Mistral AI
DeepSeek
Devstral 2 2512 saves you $55.00/month
That's $660.00/year compared to R1 at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.
| Metric | Devstral 2 2512 | R1 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 63 | 66 | R1 |
| Rank | #175 | #159 | R1 |
| Quality Rank | #175 | #159 | R1 |
| Adoption Rank | #175 | #159 | R1 |
| Parameters | -- | -- | -- |
| Context Window | 262K | 64K | Devstral 2 2512 |
| Pricing | $0.40/$2.00/M | $0.70/$2.50/M | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 50 | 50 | Devstral 2 2512 |
| Pricing | 2 | 3 | R1 |
| Context window size | 86 | 76 | Devstral 2 2512 |
| Recency | 100 | 57 | Devstral 2 2512 |
| Output Capacity | 20 | 70 | R1 |
| Benchmarks | -- | 80 | R1 |
Our composite score (0–100) combines six weighted signals: benchmark performance (25%), pricing efficiency (25%), context window size (15%), model recency (15%), output capacity (10%), and capability versatility (10%). Here's what the scores mean for these two models:
Scores 63/100 (rank #175), placing it in the top 40% of all 290 models tracked.
Scores 66/100 (rank #159), placing it in the top 46% of all 290 models tracked.
With only a 4-point gap, these models are in the same performance tier. The practical difference in output quality is minimal — your choice should depend on pricing, latency requirements, and specific feature needs.
Devstral 2 2512 offers 25% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $36.00/month with Devstral 2 2512 vs $48.00/month with R1 — a $12.00 monthly difference.
Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.
When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.
Code generation & review
Higher benchmark score (0/100) indicates stronger performance on coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring
Customer support chatbot
Faster response time (speed score 0/100) is critical for user-facing chat. Devstral 2 2512 also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support
Long document analysis
Larger context window (262K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass
Batch data extraction
Lower output pricing ($2.00/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily
Creative writing & content
Higher overall composite score (66/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content
R1 has a moderate advantage with a 3.5-point lead in composite score. It wins on more signal dimensions, but Devstral 2 2512 has specific strengths that could make it the better choice for certain workflows.
Best for Quality
Devstral 2 2512
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Cost
Devstral 2 2512
25% lower pricing; better value at scale
Best for Reliability
Devstral 2 2512
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
Devstral 2 2512
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
Devstral 2 2512
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by Mistral AI
| Capability | Devstral 2 2512 | R1 |
|---|---|---|
| Vision (Image Input) | ||
| Function Calling | ||
| Streaming | ||
| JSON Modediffers | ||
| Reasoningdiffers | ||
| Web Search | ||
| Image Output |
Mistral AI
DeepSeek
Devstral 2 2512 saves you $1.14/month
That's 27% cheaper than R1 at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.
Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.
| Parameter | Devstral 2 2512 | R1 |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 262K | 64K |
| Max Output Tokens | -- | 16,000 |
| Open Source | Yes | Yes |
| Created | Dec 9, 2025 | Jan 20, 2025 |
R1 scores 66/100 (rank #159) compared to Devstral 2 2512's 63/100 (rank #175), giving it a 4-point advantage. R1 is the stronger overall choice, though Devstral 2 2512 may excel in specific areas like cost efficiency.
Devstral 2 2512 is ranked #175 and R1 is ranked #159 out of 290+ AI models. Rankings use a composite score combining benchmark performance (25%), pricing (25%), context window (15%), recency (15%), output capacity (10%), and versatility (10%). Scores update hourly.
Devstral 2 2512 is cheaper at $2.00/M output tokens vs R1's $2.50/M output tokens — 1.3x more expensive. Input token pricing: Devstral 2 2512 at $0.40/M vs R1 at $0.70/M.
Devstral 2 2512 has a larger context window of 262,144 tokens compared to R1's 64,000 tokens. A larger context window means the model can process longer documents and conversations.